Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Battle, Leon v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv20560
Plaintiff:
Leon Battle
Defendant:
Glenn P. Miller, James Banks, Omar Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle, Leon v. Marius et al
as 1:2024cv20568
Plaintiff:
Leon Battle and Leon Carr
Defendant:
C. Marius, Chanel, Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Uhler et al
as 9:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
London Lucas
Defendant:
D. Uhler, J. Messenger, R. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2023cv80790
Plaintiff:
JAMES R BUTLER
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUTLER v. SUMMERS
as 1:2023cv00117
Petitioner:
JAMES R BUTLER
Respondent:
WARDEN WALT SUMMERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyrone Bell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 22-2132
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE ANTHONY BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, ROBERT NAPEL, CONNIE HORTON and others
Tyrone Bell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 22-1702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE ANTHONY BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, ROBERT NAPLE, CONNIE HORTON and others
Tyrone Bell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 22-1697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE ANTHONY BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, ROBERT NAPLE, CONNIE HORTON and others
Holman v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Calvin Holman
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, R. Butler, A. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddle v. Butler et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Dion Edward Riddle
Defendant:
R. Bulter, A. McClatn, Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
