Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Chung et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., incorrectly designated as Doe 1 et al
as 3:2020cv06953
Plaintiff:
Carlo Napolitano, John E. Uhri, Linda B. Robertson and others
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., incorrectly designated as Doe 5, Grocery Outlet, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, incorrectly designated as Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chavez v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2018cv03043
Plaintiff:
Juana R. Chavez
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Arrington v. Chavez
as 15-1019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY R. ARRINGTON, III
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY R. CHAVEZ
Ochoa et al v. Dakota Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01172
Defendant:
Dakota Lines, Inc. and Robert Lee Harris
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Ochoa and Ana R. Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rael v. Chavez et al
as 1:2013cv00249
Plaintiff:
Ricardo A. Rael
Defendant:
Sebastian R. Chavez , Maria Chavez and Northland Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Arrington v. Born-n-Raised, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00172
Plaintiff:
Troy R. Arrington, II
Defendant:
Born-n-Raised, Inc. and Timothy R. Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAVEZ et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv69243
Plaintiff:
JOHN R CHAVEZ and REYNALDA CHAVEZ
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES , BAIRNCO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAVEZ v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2009cv67096
Plaintiff:
WILLIE R CHAVEZ, WILLIE R CHAVEZ, WILLIE R CHAVEZ and others
Defendant:
BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY and BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
