Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Barnes v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2014cv09401
Plaintiff:
Terrence D Barnes
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Carol Smith, Director Lyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
W. v. Miller
as 3:2014cv00336
Plaintiff:
M. W.
Defendant:
William R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Village of Huntley, et al
as 3:2013cv50274
Plaintiff:
Victor Davis
Defendant:
Village of Huntley , Detective R. Miller and Other Unknown Huntley Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Fryzel
as 1:2012cv10160
Plaintiff:
Sidney R. Miller, 53rd-Ellis Currency Exchange, Inc., California-Peterson Currency Exchange, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Michael E. Fryzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Miller v. NFI Industries, Inc.
as 1:2012cv09905
Plaintiff:
James R. Miller
Defendant:
NFI Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Miller v. Atlantic Municipal Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv04316
Plaintiff:
Sidney R. Miller
Defendant:
Atlantic Municipal Corporation and David R Gray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fryzel v. Miller et al
as 1:2011cv02399
Defendant:
Sidney R. Miller, 53rd-Ellis Currency Exchange, Inc., California - Peterson Currency Exchange, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E Fryzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller et al v. Fryzel
as 1:2011cv02395
Plaintiff:
Sidney R. Miller, 53rd- Ellis Currency Exchange, Inc, California-Peterson Currency Exchange, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Michael E. Fryzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2011cv02081
Plaintiff:
Gary R Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Miller v. Zaruba et al
as 1:2010cv06533
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Miller
Defendant:
John E. Zaruba, Unknown DuPage County Deputy Sheriffs, Ushman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
