Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Acosta v. Local 1940, United Steel Workers International Union
as 1:2018cv02124
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Local 1940, United Steel Workers International Union
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
ACOSTA v. COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01608
Defendant:
SOUTH HILLS OPERATIONS LLC, MURRYSVILLE OPERATIONS LLC, CHMS GROUP LLC and others
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. MAKASI et al
as 2:2018cv16465
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
ROBERT JESTINOS MAKASI and KUDZAI MASIIWA MAKASI
ACOSTA v. CHRISTIAN HOME HEALTHCARE, CORP. et al
as 2:2018cv01194
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
INDIA CHRISTIAN and CHRISTIAN HOME HEALTHCARE, CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ACOSTA v. MOSLUOGLU, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04663
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
IHSAN GUNAYDIN, ENGIN GUNAYDIN and MOSLUOGLU, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Samaritan Caregivers, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02036
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Samaritan Caregivers, LLC and Sone E. Ekukole
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
ACOSTA v. FORMICA DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04452
Defendant:
STEVEN FORMICA, FORMICA DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING, INC., MICHAEL FORMICA and others
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Shalimar Distributors et al
as 4:2018cv01642
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
TAFS Corporation, Shalimar Distributors and Mohammad Tahir
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
ACOSTA v. SPREAD BAGELRY LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04307
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
LARRY ROSENBLUM, DIDIANE ARNUTI, SPREAD BAGELRY PENN, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. SMCHOI, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03855
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
SMCHOI, INC. and STEVE CHOI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
