Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Martin v. Accounting et al
as 3:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Marshall Martin
Defendant:
Accounting and R. C. Mathena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mathena
as 3:2014cv00329
Petitioner:
Gary B. Williams
Respondent:
R. C. Mathena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barbour v. Mathena
as 7:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Barbour
Defendant:
R. C. Mathena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2012cv00680
Petitioner:
Ross E. Turner
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Harold Clarke and R. C. Mathena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lyndrell Hawkins v. R. Mathena
as 12-6870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNDRELL DEMOND HAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
R. C. MATHENA, Chief Warden, MR. KISER, Assistant Chief Warden, MR. MCBRIDE, Institution Doctor and others
Via v. Mathena
as 7:2012cv00117
Respondent:
R. C. Mathena
Petitioner:
Barry Lynn Via
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Mathena et al
as 7:2012cv00095
Defendant:
Mr. Ronnie Brock, Corizon Health Service, Inc, Ms. Kilgore and others
Plaintiff:
Lyndrell Demond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 7:2012cv00069
Respondent:
Harold Clark, John S. Garman, R. C. Mathena and others
Petitioner:
Deonta Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eleazar Totten v. R. Mathena
as 11-7475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELEAZAR TOTTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
R. C. MATHENA, Chief Warden
Onwuka v. Keen Mountain Correctional Center et al
as 7:2011cv00485
Defendant:
Keen Mountain Correctional Center, R. C. Mathena and Unknown Dog Handlers
Plaintiff:
John Onwuka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
