Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Local Union 342 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada v. R E Milano Plumbing Corporation
as 3:2023cv04646
Petitioner:
Local Union 342 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada
Respondent:
R E Milano Plumbing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Trevino v. Dotson et al
as 3:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
E. Dotson, T. Ross, S. Newcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
R. E. et al v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv06939
Defendant:
Altria Group Inc., JUUL Labs, Inc, Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
P. K. E. and R. E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re Pacific Fertility Center Litigation
as 3:2018cv01586
Defendant:
Pacific Fertility Center and Prelude Fertility, Inc.
Plaintiff:
R. E. , Megan Bauer , Jonathan Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Frost v. Hallock et al
as 3:2017cv07229
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kevin Frost, Sr.
Defendant:
J. Hallock, J. Hunt, T. A. Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trevino v. Dotson et al
as 4:2015cv05373
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
E. Dotson, D. Ambriz, D. Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Beard et al
as 4:2014cv03724
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez
Defendant:
J. A. Beard, R. E. Barnes and R. L. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Barnes
as 1:2014cv01791
Petitioner:
Willie Eugene Weaver
Respondent:
R E Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman v. Barnes
as 3:2014cv01640
Plaintiff:
Rahsaan Coleman
Defendant:
R. E. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddy v. Barnes et al
as 4:2014cv01642
Plaintiff:
Michael Gaddy
Defendant:
R. E. Barnes and N. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
