Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 154
In re: J. D. v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-16693
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC and others
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
J. D. v. Hoyoung Huh, et al
as 22-16694
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: HOYOUNG HUH, NICHOLAS PRITZKER and RIAZ VALANI
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PAX LABS, INC. and others
J. D. v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-16695
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: JUUL LABS, INC.
Defendant: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PAX LABS, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and others
Hernandez v. Guevara et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv06587
Petitioner: Joel Alexandro Hernandez
Respondent: Ana Yaneth Aceituno Guevara and Sandra Lucia Herrera Hernandez
Interested Party: R-F-H-A- and G-L-H-A-
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 - INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION REMEDIES
Gonzalez v. Guildner et al
as 1:2022cv01330
Plaintiff: Andrew R. Gonzalez
Defendant: Bradley R. F. Guildner and City of York, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
R.F. v. Board of Education of Whitehall Central School District et al
as 1:2022cv00815
Plaintiff: R. F.
Defendant: Board of Education of Whitehall Central School District, Whitehall Central School District, Keith Redmond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
In re: J. D., et al v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-80063
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Respondent: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant: PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC, JAMES MONSEES and others
Petitioner: JUUL LABS, INC.
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
In re: J.D., et al v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-80061
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Petitioner: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Respondent: JUUL LABS, INC., J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning and others
Defendant: GREGORY LEHMAN, TAGGART KNUTSON, PAX LABS, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61138
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02608
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?