Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Constitution Association, Inc., et al v. Kamala Harris
as 21-56287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONSTITUTION ASSOCIATION, INC., by its founders, GEORGE F.X. ROMBACH, DOUGLAS V. GIBBS and others
Plaintiff:
B. GREEN, R. HANDY, A. HURLEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Constitution Association, Inc. et al v. Harris
as 3:2020cv02379
Plaintiff:
R. Kowell, C. Mongiello, George F.X. Rombach and others
Defendant:
Kamala Devi Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 an
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Handy v. Reed et al
as 3:2014cv03395
Plaintiff:
James R Handy
Defendant:
Marvin Reed, Eli Goodman, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Handy v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2014cv01880
Plaintiff:
Tennessee R. Handy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Financial Network Investment, et al v. Kayvan Karoon, et al
as 11-56672
Petitioner - Appellee:
FINANCIAL NETWORK INVESTMENT CORP., JOHN SIMMERS, AL JOHNSON and others
Respondent - Appellant:
KAYVAN KAROON and KAROON CAPITAL MARKETS, INC.
Kayvan Karoon et al v. Financial Network Investment Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00906
Defendant:
Financial Network Investment Corporation, Jack R Handy, Jr, ING Advisors Network and others
Plaintiff:
Kayvan Karoon and Karoon Capital Markets Inc
Kayvan Karoon et al v. Financial Network Investment Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv09889
Defendant:
Financial Network Investment Corporation, Jack R. Handy, Jr., ING Advisors Network and others
Plaintiff:
Kayvan Karoon and Karoon Capital Markets Inc
Financial Network Investment Corp et al v. Kayvan Karoon et al
as 2:2010cv09844
Petitioner:
Financial Network Investment Corp, Jack R. Handy, Jr., ING Advisors Network and others
Respondent:
Kayvan Karoon and Karoon Capital Markets Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
