Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Terry Ferguson v. C. Messer
as 19-6390
Defendant / Appellee:
L. M. BRYANT, ROSP Correctional Officer, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER STALLARD, POWERS, ROSP Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY TYRONE FERGUSON
Gary Wall v. Jeffrey Artrip
as 16-7308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY WALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY ARTRIP, Delta-Building Unit Manager, TORI RAIFORD, Counselor/Unit Manager, J. FANNIN, Lieutenant and others
Malcolm Muhammad v. R. Mathena
as 15-7219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALCOLM MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
R. MATHENA, Warden, JOHN D. WARATH, Assistant Warden, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Operations and others
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Harold Clark
as 14-7671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Plaintiff:
UHURU SEKOU OBATAIYE-ALLAH
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARK, Director, DOC, GERALD K. WASHINGTON, Regional Director, R. MATHENA, Warden and others
Reginald Ball v. Jeffrey Artrip
as 14-7659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD KEITH BALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY ARTRIP, G. K. WASHINGTON, ASST. WARDEN WALWRATH and others
Uhuru Obataiye-Allah v. Kevin Snodgrass, Jr.
as 14-7213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UHURU SEKOU OBATAIYE-ALLAH
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR., HAROLD W. CLARK, Director, DOC, GERALD K. WASHINGTON, Regional Director and others
Osbourne v. Clarke et al
as 7:2012cv00301
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Lara K. Jacobs, A. Kilbourne and others
Plaintiff:
Derwin Osbourne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sauls v. Mathena
as 2:2012cv00279
Petitioner:
Clifton Sauls
Respondent:
R. Mathena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oyler v. Garman et al
as 7:2009cv00235
Plaintiff:
Sammy Ray Oyler
Defendant:
J Garman, L. Huffman, R. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Couch v. R. Mathena
as 09-6472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM R. COUCH
Defendant - Appellee:
R. MATHENA, DONALD VASS and LARRY HUFFMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
