Cases 41 - 50 of 59
MARTINEZ v. FREUND et al
as 2:2013cv06294
Plaintiff:
HECTOR R. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
BASTIAN FREUND, JAMES W. ARENTZEN and R. SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUSTIN v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2013cv06226
Petitioner:
HASSAN AUSTIN
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL, R. SETH WILLIAMS and LINDA L. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROOT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv05584
Petitioner:
BRAD ROOT
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MAULE v. WILLIAMS
as 2:2013cv04428
Plaintiff:
R. BRADLEY MAULE
Defendant:
R. SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. FISHER et al
as 2:2013cv00896
Petitioner:
KAREEM SMITH
Respondent:
JON D. FISHER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF R. SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORD v. BICKEL et al
as 2:2013cv00489
Petitioner:
ALBERT FORD
Respondent:
TABB BICKEL, R. SETH WILLIAMS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GIORDANO v. MURANO-NIX et al
as 2:2012cv07034
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GIORDANO
Defendant:
MARGARET MURANO-NIX and R. SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEJESUS v. SAUERS et al
as 2:2012cv04061
Petitioner:
ANGEL DEJESUS
Respondent:
DEBRA SAUERS, R. SETH WILLIAMS and LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRANKS v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2012cv03869
Petitioner:
JAMES E. FRANKS
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, THOMAS CORBETT and R. SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
