Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Hector Meza v. R. Smith
as 23-55124
Petitioner / Appellant:
HECTOR MEZA
Respondent / Appellee:
R. W. SMITH
Ismael Villarreal v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 21-56194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMAEL VILLARREAL
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KENNETH J. POGUE, CDCR Director and others
Abbey Bridges Construction Co., LLC v. Kroger Limited Partnership I, et al
as 3:2021cv00063
Defendant:
R. W. Smith Company, Kroger Limited Partnership 1 and Kroger Limited Partnership I
Plaintiff:
Abbey Bridges Construction Co., LLC doing business as Abbey Bridges Construction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ismael Villarreal v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 2:2020cv08554
Defendant:
Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Ismael Villarreal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Garcia v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2020cv01893
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Anthony Carter, J. Zavala and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Villarreal v. Diaz et al
as 2:2020cv01809
Defendant:
Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Ismael Villarreal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Garcia v. Diaz et al
as 2:2020cv01743
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Anthony Carter, J. Cabral and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Rodriguez v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 2:2020cv01650
Defendant:
C. Rascon, Ralph Diaz, S. Moore, Sr and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan C. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Bruce v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2020cv00497
Defendant:
C. Rascon, Ralph Diaz, S. Moore, Sr and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Bruce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor H. Fuentes v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2020cv00450
Defendant:
C. Rascon, Ralph Diaz, S. Moore, Sr and others
Plaintiff:
Victor H. Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
