Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Akande v. United States Marshal Service
as 19-116
Defendant / Appellee:
Geoffrey M. Stone, Connecticut U.S. Attorney, Grace Ann Wisniewski, ICE Special Agent, John Doe 2, Bureau of Prisons Agent and others
Defendant:
John Doe 3, Inmate System Management Coordinator Wyatt Federal Detention Centre, R.I., United States Marshals Service, Director, Warden, Wyatt, Central Falls Detention Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason Shola Akande
MacKay v. Crews
as 14-1566
Plaintiff:
Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant:
Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee:
Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
MacKay v. Crews
as 14-836
Plaintiff:
Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant:
Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee:
Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
MacKay v. Crews
as 13-4140
Plaintiff:
Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant:
Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee:
Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
MacKay v. Crew
as 12-5039
Plaintiff:
Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant:
Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee:
Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. R.I. Pools Incorporated
as 11-3529
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Thomas Van Riper, Susan Van Riper, Andrew Peake and others
Defendant - Appellant:
R.I. Pools Incorporated, Franco Iannone and Vincenzo Iannone
Harleysville Worcester Ins Co v. Paramount Concrete, Inc et al
as 3:2011cv00578
Plaintiff:
Harleysville Worcester Ins Co
Defendant:
Paramount Concrete, Inc, R.I. Pools Inc and Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. R.I. Pools Incorporated
as 10-4357
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Thomas Van Riper, Susan Van Riper, Andrew Peake and others
Defendant - Appellant:
R.I. Pools Incorporated, Franco Iannone and Vincenzo Iannone
WhitServe LLC v. Dennemeyer & Co. LLC et al
as 3:2010cv01182
Plaintiff:
WhitServe LLC
Defendant:
Dennemeyer & Co. LLC, Dennemyer & Co. S.a r.I, Ladas & Parry LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
