Cases
Cases 21 - 25 of 25
McArthur, et al v. Beard, et al
as 08-1639
Plaintiff: FRANCIS HANNON, RAYMOND COOK, JOSE ALVES and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAWRENCE M. MCARTHUR
Defendant - Appellee: JEFFREY BEARD, STEVEN KENNEWAY, MASSACHUSETTS CORRECTION OFFICERS FEDERATED UNION and others
Defendant: MITT ROMNEY, KATHLEEN DENNEHY, Commissioner, EDWARD A. FLYNN and others
Gaouette, et al v. Beard, et al
as 08-1632
Plaintiff: FRANCIS HANNON, RAYMOND COOK, JOSE ALVES and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: JUSTIN GAOUETTE
Defendant - Appellee: JEFFREY BEARD, STEVEN KENNEWAY, MASSACHUSETTS CORRECTION OFFICERS FEDERATED UNION and others
Defendant: MITT ROMNEY, KATHLEEN DENNEHY, Commissioner, EDWARD A. FLYNN and others
European Community et al v. RJR Nabisco, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2002cv05771
Plaintiff: Czech Republic, European Community, Federal Republic of Germany and others
Defendant: Nabisco Group Holdings Corp., R.J. Reynolds Global Products, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and others
Unknown: C. Stephen Heard and Brendan J. LeMoult
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Philip Morris Inc v. Repub Venezuela, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 00-7213
Defendant - Appellant: Philip Morris Incorporated, Philip Morris Companies, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Republic of Venezuela
Holiday Wholesale, et al v. Philip Morris, et al
as 1:2000cv00447
Plaintiff: Williamson Oil Company, Inc., Holiday Wholesale Grocery Co.,, Suwanee Swifty Stores, Inc., D.I.P., and others
Defendant: Philip Morris Companies, Inc., Philip Morris, Inc., R.J.R. Nabisco Holdings Corp and others
Respondent: Tennessee Plaintiffs
Petitioner: Tobacco Merchants Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 4 USDC Jurisdiction re violations of Sec. 1-7 of Title 15

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?