Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Tamar Harvey v. Ralph Coleman
as 23-7104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMAR DEVELL HARVEY
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH R. COLEMAN, Lieutenant, TIMOTHY W. GREEN, Unit Manager of Housing Unit 6, M.A. BAILEY, Senior Warden and others
Defendant:
SERGEANT HOBBS, SERGEANT WOODBURY, E. CLAY, AD Food Service Manager and others
Washington v. R.S. Dunbar, Warden
as 0:2023cv04464
Petitioner:
Dwonne Washington
Respondent:
R.S. Dunbar, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pullins v. Dunbar et al
as 0:2023cv02328
Petitioner:
Demetrius Pullins
Respondent:
R.S. Dunbar and FCI-Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morning v. Dunbar
as 8:2023cv01530
Petitioner:
Andre Morning, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden R.S. Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lowe v. R.S. Dunbar
as 2:2023cv01511
Petitioner:
Kendrick Lowe
Respondent:
Warden R.S. Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Myers v. R.S. Dunbar
as 9:2023cv01404
Petitioner:
Matthew Daniel Myers
Respondent:
R.S. Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. R.S. Dunbar
as 8:2023cv01069
Petitioner:
Harold Vernon Smith
Respondent:
R.S. Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marsh v. Dunbar
as 2:2022cv04412
Petitioner:
Marcus Terrelle Marsh
Respondent:
Warden R.S. Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cherfils v. Warden
as 8:2022cv03241
Petitioner:
Francis Cherfils
Respondent:
R.S. Dunbar, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marsh v. Dunbar
as 2:2022cv02960
Petitioner:
Marcus Terrelle Marsh
Respondent:
R.S. Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
