Cases 1 - 10 of 375
Thornburg v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03575
Plaintiff:
Ralph Thornburg
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McKinnon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02545
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ralph McKinnon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dawson v. Sargus et al
as 2:2024cv02175
Plaintiff:
William T. Dawson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Edmund A Sargus, Jr, Christin Werner, Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02164
Plaintiff:
Ralph Davis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Isham v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Isham and Estate of Elijah Isham
Defendant:
Chief Craig Richardson, Sergeant Kenneth Lloyd, Scott Kinderdine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Ralph Bradley
Defendant:
3M Company, Tyco Fire Products, LP, Chemguard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati, Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Felten v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01777
Plaintiff:
Ralph Felten
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nice Jr. v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Ralph Nice Jr.
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pina v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Ralph Pina
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
