Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 177
Ramos v. Erwin
as 24-20164
Plaintiff: Alberto Ramos
Defendant: Scott Erwin, Jennifer Gilbreath, Hallie Smith and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Daywalt v. Blanquiz et al
as 5:2024cv00222
Plaintiff: James Daywalt
Defendant: Michael Blanquiz, Ramiro J. Juarez-Ramos, Rachel Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. Causey
as 24-60080
Plaintiff: Gabino Ramos Hernandez
Defendant: Phillip Causey, John Doe, An Unknown Immigration and Customs Enforcement Officer and United States of America
Diaz v. Cantu
as 24-50088
Plaintiff: Enriqueta Diaz
Defendant: Ramsey English Cantu, Maverick County Judge, Roxanna Rios, Commissioner Precinct 2, Olga Ramos, Commissioner Precinct 3 and others
Espinoza v. Ramos et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff: Lynda Espinoza
Defendant: Stephen Ramos and The City of San Antonio, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz v. Cantu
as 24-50026
Plaintiff: Enriqueta Diaz
Defendant: Ramsey Enlish Cantu, Maverick County Judge, Roxanna Rios, Commissioner Precinct 2, Olga Ramos, Commissioner Precinct 3 and others
Garcia et al v. Ramos et al
as 5:2023cv01508
Plaintiff: Edgar Garcia, Eric Garcia and April Garcia
Defendant: Oscar Ramos, Bryan Patten, Juan Carlos-Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz v. Enlish Cantu et al
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff: Enriqueta Diaz
Defendant: Ramsey Enlish Cantu, Roxanna Rios, Olga Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02276
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?