Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Maria Ramos De Caal v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1650
Petitioner:
MARIA RAYMUNDO RAMOS DE CAAL, E.C.R. and M.M.C.R.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Dina Vasquez Ramos v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1553
Petitioner:
DINA ABIGAIL VASQUEZ RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Jose Ramos-Escobar v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1408
Petitioner:
JOSE FREDY RAMOS-ESCOBAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Innovative Sports Management Inc.v. Estrada Ramos Inc.
as 1:2021cv03136
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management Inc. d/b/a/ Integrated Sports Media and Innovative Sports Management Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Estrada Ramos Inc. d/b/a Elizabeth Bar and Grill, Tomas Estrada and Estrada Ramos Inc. doing business as Elizabeth Bar & Grill
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
US v. Alvaro Ramos-Huinil
as 21-4640
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALVARO RAMOS-HUINIL
Menjivar et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review
as 1:2021cv02355
Plaintiff:
Lennis Landaverde Menjivar, Fernando Turcios Escobar, Ada Rodas Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
US v. Miguel Medrano-Ramos
as 21-4097
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL MEDRANO-RAMOS, a/k/a Miguel A. Medrano-Ramos, a/k/a Miguel Medrano-Ramos, a/k/a Miguel Angel Ramos, a/k/a Miguel T. Medrano, a/k/a Miguel Hector Medrano, a/k/a Miguel Medrano
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ana Pineda-Ramos v. Jeffrey Rosen
as 21-1042
Petitioner:
ANA YESSELI PINEDA-RAMOS
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting Attorney General
US v. Jorge Ramos-Luna
as 21-4001
Defendant / Appellant:
JORGE RAMOS-LUNA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
