Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Subramanya v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2020cv03707
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ken Cuccinelli and Ernest Destefano
Plaintiff:
Ranjitha Subramanya, Kebin Palma Sanchez, Lucrecia Rosa Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Ramos v. Lorain County Children Services et al
as 1:2020cv01388
Defendant:
Michelle Hunt, Todd Esterburg, Nancy Griffiths and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ramos, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02452
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rosalie Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02427
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Telu Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01530
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Linda Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2019cv02807
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and United States Attorney
Plaintiff:
Iris Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ramos Rolon v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03375
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ramon Antonio Ramos Rolon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03189
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ramos
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
North American Roofing Services, Inc. et al v. Ramos Roofing Company, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00972
Defendant:
Nautilus Insurance Company, First Mercury Insurance Company and Ramos Roofing Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Arch Insurance Company and North American Roofing Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01725
Defendant:
Davol Inc., and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Ramos and Laura Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
