Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Reyes et al v. Ramos et al
as 1:2015cv01625
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reyes , Cristian Campo and Patricia Martinez
Defendant:
Nicolas Ramos, NICO, Inc, Arcos, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cruz Diaz et al v. Fushun Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv01306
Plaintiff:
Maria Cruz Diaz and Osmar Del Cid Ramos
Defendant:
Fushun Inc., Chang-Ching Huang, Chun Hua Tung and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Canales v. Alicia Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv03780
Plaintiff:
Fredis H Canales
Defendant:
Alicia Restaurant, Inc. and Miguel A. Ramos-Molina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01919
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramos v. USA - 2255
as 8:2014cv01510
Petitioner:
Raul Castillo Ramos
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramos v. Target Corporation et al
as 8:2014cv01360
Plaintiff:
Mia G. Ramos
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Bell Sports, Inc. and Easton-Bell Sports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03714
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Zepeda-Aguilar et al
as 8:2013cv03652
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
Defendant:
Willians Ernest Zepeda-Aguilar, Praxedes Funes Ramos, Santos Euceda-Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucker et al v. Ramos et al
as 8:2013cv03201
Plaintiff:
Samuel Tucker and Vonda-Linda Biggus
Defendant:
Jose Ramos and National Retail Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Georgia Commerce Bank v. Sadel et al
as 1:2013cv03092
Plaintiff:
Georgia Commerce Bank
Defendant:
Steven A. Sadel and Irma Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
