Cases 11 - 20 of 47
CLAUDIO v. KELLY
as 5:2013cv00354
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Defendant:
ANGUS KELLY, RANDALL BRYANT, LINDA CAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANDBERRY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2011cv00620
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WALTER MCNEIL, RANDALL BRYANT and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL STANDBERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rease v. McNeil et al
as 3:2011cv01222
Plaintiff:
Michael Rease
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil, Randall Bryant, Officer Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albers v. Morgenthal et al
as 6:2011cv01461
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Albers
Defendant:
Robert Morgenthal, Randall Bryant, 6 Unknown Cell Extraction Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatt v. Buss et al
as 3:2011cv00546
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Wyatt
Defendant:
Edwin G. Buss, Walter A. McNeil, James McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bryant et al
as 3:2010cv00886
Plaintiff:
Walter Nathaniel Smith
Defendant:
Randall Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2009cv00151
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BERNARD ROBINSON, JR
Defendant:
RANDALL BRYANT, SIMEON CERDAN and W SHANLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. McNeil et al
as 3:2009cv00447
Plaintiff:
Glen Floyd
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil, Randall Bryant and Marvin Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Younk et al v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00442
Plaintiff:
Thomas Younk, Robert Hodowanes, Michael Lamb and others
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Randall Bryant and R. K. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Hicks et al
as 3:2009cv00403
Plaintiff:
Joy Perry
Defendant:
Milton Hicks, Randall Bryant, Brian Riedl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
