Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SIMONS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv51204
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL SIMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMONS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79003
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL SIMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEDLEY et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03263
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SCHRODT, EDWARD BRUNETTI, JEFFREY KILCREASE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Medley et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02247
Plaintiff:
Joshua Schrodt, Edward Brunetti, Jeffrey Kilcrease and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Simons v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv00848
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Randall Simons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Simons v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 9:2009cv80218
Plaintiff:
Kim Randall Simons
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Simons v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00742
Plaintiff:
Kim Randall Simons
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Simon v. drugstore.com inc et al
as 2:2004cv01510
Plaintiff:
Randall Simon
Defendant:
drugstore.com inc, Kal Raman, Robert A Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Elliott v. drugstore.com inc et al
as 2:2004cv01474
Plaintiff:
Frederic J Elliott and Kathleen Keul
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Duft Group, Randall Simon, Jane Zebari and others
Defendant:
drugstore.com inc, Kal Raman, Robert Barton and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Peter M Neupert
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
