Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Ellen Russ v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.
as 23-277
Petitioner:
ELLEN RUSS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Respondent:
MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS, INC., MARRIOTT RESORTS HOSPITALITY CORPORATION, OCEANWATCH VILLAS OWNERS ASSOCIATION and others
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, The et al v. McMaster et al
as 3:2021cv03302
Plaintiff:
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, The and Taiwan Scott
Defendant:
Henry D McMaster, Harvey Peeler, Luke A Rankin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
US v. Michael Rankins
as 21-7023
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Napoleon Rankin Bey v. Sgt. Massenberg
as 21-7015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAPOLEON J. RANKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. MASSENBERG, CHRISTOPHER ROLFE, Unit Manger, SGT. PEARSON and others
Napoleon Rankin Bey v. Correctional Officer Singleton
as 21-6705
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY BENNETT, HALLOWAY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HENDERSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAPOLEON J. RANKIN BEY
David Meyers v. J. Brown
as 21-6669
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DIAL, A. WELLINTON, UNIT MANAGER J. BROWN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Levar Stoney
as 21-6675
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYOR LEVAR STONEY, Mayor of the City of Richmond VA, IVAN GILMORE, Warden of Sussex I State Prison, RICHARD CARSON VORHIS, Assistant Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Petersburg Circuit Court
as 21-6662
Defendant / Appellee:
BENJAMIN RATZ, JOSEPH M. TEEFY, Judge, ATTORNEY TERRY DRISKILL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Napoleon Rankin Bey v. State of North Carolina
as 21-6492
Petitioner / Appellant:
NAPOLEON J. RANKIN BEY
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
In re: Napoleon Rankin
as 21-151
Petitioner:
In re: NAPOLEON J. RANKIN, a/k/a Napoleon J. Rankin Bey, a/k/a Napoleon Rankin-Bey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
