Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rapp v. Sine et al
as 4:2020cv00230
Defendant:
Tim Sine and Sine Ranch, LLC
Plaintiff:
Phil Rapp
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rapp et al v. Sutherland Mortgage Services, Inc.
as 4:2017cv01010
Plaintiff:
William Rapp and Larry Eggett
Defendant:
Sutherland Mortgage Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rapp v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv00829
Plaintiff:
Penny L Rapp
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Rapp v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv01110
Plaintiff:
Penny L Rapp
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Rapp et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00493
Plaintiff:
Valerie Rapp and Clifford Rapp
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rapp et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00388
Plaintiff:
George Rapp and Sharon Rapp
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Rapp v. McCraw et al
as 1:2012cv01135
Defendant:
Freestone County, Col. Steve McCraw, James Richard "Rick" Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Rapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03513
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
