Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv17137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROSS v. DITECH FINANCIAL LLC et al
as 1:2019cv12263
Defendant:
JENNIFER STEAD, ESQ., LAW OFFICES OF RAS CITRON, LLC and DITECH FINANCIAL LLC
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES ROSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOUSE v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB et al
as 3:2019cv09059
Defendant:
SELENE FINANCE LP, WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, D/B/A CHRISTIANA TRUST, NOT INDIVIDUALLY BUT AS TRUSTEE FOR PRETIUM MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST, RAS CITRON, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv08865
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AGARWAL et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv03125
Defendant:
MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, JACQUELINE L. RUSSELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANIL AGARWAL, MADHU AGARWAL and RISHI RAKSHPAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Clark v. Robertson, Anschutz, & Schneid, PL et al
as 3:2018cv00799
Plaintiff:
Matthew Richard Clark, III
Defendant:
Robertson, Anschutz, & Schneid, PL , David Schneid , RAS Crane, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMILTON v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL et al
as 2:2017cv12303
Plaintiff:
HENRY HAMILTON
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL, GERALD L. REIF, RAS CITRON LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC v. PAMPANIN et al
as 2:2015cv08699
Plaintiff:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC
Defendant:
CAROLYN PAMPANIN , NICHOLAS PAMPANIN and USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
Thirdparty_defendant:
Johnna Rockwell and RAS Citron, LLC
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
CAROLYN PAMPANIN
Cross_claimant:
CAROLYN PAMPANIN
Cross_defendant:
NICHOLAS PAMPANIN
Counter_claimant:
CAROLYN PAMPANIN
Counter_defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
