Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 387
RAY v. PRIVER et al
as 1:2024cv01186
Plaintiff: AMES RAY
Defendant: DONALD PRIVER, JON LAWSON and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
TATUM v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff: THOMAS TATUM
Defendant: JOSEPH BIDEN, METROPOLITAN POLICE, DANIEL THAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BARRY v. INCH et al
as 1:2023cv03614
Plaintiff: BRANDIE LEE BARRY and RANDY CLAYTON BARRY
Consolidated Plaintiff: WILLIAM RILEY, SANDRA BLEVINS, JAMIE A. MADDOX and others
Defendant: MARK S INCH, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Christopher Grider
as 23-3103
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Christopher Ray Grider
SAKATU et al v. VIRGIN ISLANDS OF THE UNITED ST ATES et al
as 1:2023cv01601
Plaintiff: MAKURIJA SAKATU and MAIPURI ARAUAN NATION
Defendant: VIRGIN ISLANDS OF THE UNITED ST ATES, CONNAL RIVIERA ALFRED FIRST BANK, DENISE GEORGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bobby Grady v. Louise Flanagan
as 23-5097
Plaintiff / Appellant: Bobby Ray Grady
Defendant / Appellee: Louise W. Flanagan, U.S. District Court Judge
In re: Karl Masek
as 23-5066
In Re: In re: Karl Ray Masek
WILLEQUER v. WYNDHAM VACATION RESORTS@NAT'L HARBOR
as 1:2022cv03771
Plaintiff: LANDEN RAY WILLEQUER
Defendant: WYNDHAM VACATION RESORTS@NAT'L HARBOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CARNEY v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
as 1:2022cv03311
Plaintiff: CHARLIE RAY CARNEY
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
John Ray v. CLH New York Ave, LLC, et al
as 22-7137
Plaintiff / Appellant: John L. Ray
Defendant / Appellee: CLH New York Ave, LLC, Richard Cohen, Donnie Hinton and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?