Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Ray v. F.B.O.P
as 1:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Nathan E. Ray
Respondent:
F.B.O.P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schuchardt v. City of Boise et al
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Luke Schuchardt and Luke Ray Schuchardt
Defendant:
City of Boise, Ryan Pollard and Craig Sousa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paz v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Federico Paz
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Adrian Paz, Tom Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marsden v. Graham, et al.
as 4:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Marsden
Defendant:
Zebulon Graham and Randall Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Treasure v. Portneuf Medical Center
as 4:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Brock Ray Treasure
Defendant:
Portneuf Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ray et al v. Schile et al
as 1:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Natasha J. Ray, Thomas Frisch, Thomas DeShazo and others
Defendant:
David Schile, Katelin E. Bartles, Benjaman V. Schile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 1:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andoe v. U.S. Secretary of State et al
as 1:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Andoe and Ralph Edward Andoe
Defendant:
U.S. Secretary of State, U.S. Attorney General, Correctional Corporaton of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Reynolds v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Petitioner:
Ray Reynolds
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Randy Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
