Cases 1 - 10 of 786
Mason v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
Ray Mason
Defendant:
John Doe, Major Matthews, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Livingston v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company et al
as 1:2024cv02959
Plaintiff:
Jean T. Livingston
Defendant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Juan Luciano, Michael Burke and others
Damper v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02869
Plaintiff:
Ray Timothy Damper
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Sebastien A Magiera, J.D. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JARANIN CHAROEN COMPANY LIMITED v. Luciano et al
as 1:2024cv02562
Plaintiff:
JARANIN CHAROEN COMPANY LIMITED
Defendant:
Juan R Luciano, Michael S Burke, Theodore Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Reeves v. Wills
as 3:2024cv00816
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Reeves
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Willits et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq00469
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Gene Ray Willits and Judy Willits
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Chevron USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Payne v. Employs at CCDOC et al
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Kraig Payne
Defendant:
Employs at CCDOC, Mims, Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chow v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company et al
as 1:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Raymond Chow
Defendant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Juan Luciano, Vikram Luthar and others
Spivey v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
Ray Charles Spivey
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Mindi Nurse, Tilden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
