Cases 1 - 10 of 12
PORTLAND REGENCY INC et al v. RBS CITIZENS NA et al
as 2:2012cv00408
Plaintiff:
PORTLAND REGENCY INC and TOP OF EXCHANGE LLC
Defendant:
RBS CITIZENS NA and CITIZENS BANK NEW HAMPSHIRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
RBS Citizens NA v. Callaghan
as 3:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens NA
Defendant:
John Callaghan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RBS Citizens N A v. Monticello Lumber Co Inc et al
as 4:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens NA
Defendant:
Monticello Lumber Co Inc and James J Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RBS Citizens, NA v. 3800 Varsity Drive, LLC
as 2:2011cv11160
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens, NA
Defendant:
3800 Varsity Drive, LLC , Francis D. Clark and Jeffrey S. Starman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RBS Citizens, NA v. A. P. Development, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02740
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens, NA
Defendant:
A. P. Development, Inc. and Piotr Piechnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
RBS Citizens, NA v. P & M Wellness Group, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv02746
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens, NA
Defendant:
P & M Wellness Group, LLC and Michelle Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RBS Citizens, NA v. Concord Xpress Logistics, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01840
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens, NA
Defendant:
Concord Xpress Logistics, Inc., Michael Ayache and Christian Papana
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gmul Sahar Financial Instruments, LLC v. RBS Citizens, NA
as 2:2008cv12934
Plaintiff:
Gmul Sahar Financial Instruments, LLC
Defendant:
RBS Citizens, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Negotiable Instrumen
RBS Citizens NA v. McGreevy
as 1:2008cv00255
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens NA
Defendant:
Carol E. McGreevy
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RBS Citizens NA v. Caldera Management Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00242
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens NA
Defendant:
Caldera Management Inc., Mark G. McGreevy, Daniel B. McGreevy and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
