Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Taylor Read et al v. Hyundai Motor America et al
as 8:2024cv01123
Plaintiff: Taylor Read, Kevin Neu and Amit Jain
Defendant: HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA INC., a California corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01973
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Amber Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 2:2023cv06439
Plaintiff: Amber Doe
Defendant: Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
(PC) Van Huisen v. DEA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01116
Plaintiff: Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant: Drug Enforcement Agency, Dobewood Derrin, William Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyna v. City of Santa Cruz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv03121
Plaintiff: Rhonda Reyna and Rhonda E Reyna
Defendant: City of Santa Cruz, County of Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amber Doe v. Michael Lewis Goguen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02280
Plaintiff: Amber Doe
Defendant: Michael Lewis Goguen, Sequoia Capital, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Douglas Hayes Menuez v. Brian K. Roemmele
as 5:2023cv00371
Plaintiff: Douglas Hayes Menuez
Defendant: Brian K. Roemmele Brian K. Roemmele dba Read Multiplex and dba Multiplex doing business as Read Multiplex doing business as Multiplex and Brian K. Roemmele an individual doing business as Read Multiplex doing business as Multiplex
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
City of Agawam, Massachusetts et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff: City of Agawam, Massachusetts, City of Amesbury, Massachusetts, City of Beverly, Massachusetts and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hinds, et al. v. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.
as 3:2022cv04730
Plaintiff: Deborah Hinds, et al., Deborah Hinds, Michael Hawkins and others
Defendant: ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Apotex Corp., ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Valerie Vig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
OptumRX Inc. v. A & S Drugs LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv00468
Petitioner: OptumRX Inc.
Respondent: A & S Drugs LLC and A and S Drugs LLC
Consolidated Defendant: Mytillini Enterprises, The Casey Group, Beatties Community Pharmacy Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?