Cases 11 - 20 of 115
Manchanda v. Attorney Grievance Committee for the First Judicial Department et al
as 1:2023cv03356
Petitioner:
Rahul Dev Manchanda, Esq.
Respondent:
Attorney Grievance Committee for the First Judicial Department, Remi Shea, Jorge Dopico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Dawson v. Reardon
as 9:2023cv00148
Petitioner:
Malik Dawson
Respondent:
Patrick Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adamson v. Reardon et al
as 9:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Adamson
Defendant:
Patrick Reardon, David DeBejian, E. Pfendler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Rettig et al
as 6:2023cv06018
Plaintiff:
Keith Bryant
Defendant:
Charles Rettig and Roberta Reardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. McCoy et al
as 9:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff McCoy, Christine Onley, Patrick Reardon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cato v. Reardon et al
as 9:2022cv01173
Plaintiff:
Jason ET Cato and Jason Cato
Defendant:
Patrick Reardon, Schneider, Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Annucci
as 1:2022cv05325
Petitioner:
John Curry
Respondent:
Patrick Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Reardon
as 9:2022cv00878
Petitioner:
John Curry
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci and Patrick Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burger v. Annnucci et al
as 9:2022cv00867
Plaintiff:
Merwin W. Burger, Jr.
Defendant:
A. Annnucci, Carl Koenigsmann, John Morley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Kessler et al
as 9:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vargas
Defendant:
C.O. Kessler, Derocco, John Doe #6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
