Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flemming et al v. Dayoub, et al
as 5:2022cv03066
Plaintiff:
Antonio B. Flemming, James Michael Poterbin, Kurt Kingsley and others
Defendant:
Charles A. Dayoub, United States Marshal Service, (fnu) Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bowers v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03224
Plaintiff:
Faheem L. Bowers
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, (fnu) Roemich, (fnu) Spellman and others
Petitioner:
Donzell A. Jones, Antonio B. Flemming and Emmanuel J. Sanders
Interested Party:
CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts et al v. TransAm Trucking, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02073
Plaintiff:
John Curtis, Reginald Bradley, David Coleman and others
Defendant:
TransAm Trucking, Inc. and Olathe Noble Equipment Leasing, Inc.
Flemming v. Core Civic et al
as 5:2021cv03020
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flemming
Defendant:
Reginald Baker, (fnu) Spheres, Core Civic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flemming v. Core Civic et al
as 5:2021cv03018
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flemming
Defendant:
Reginald Baker, (fnu) Spheres, Core Civic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flemming v. Core Civic et al
as 5:2021cv03019
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flemming
Defendant:
Reginald Baker, (fnu) Spheres, Core Civic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flemming v. Baker
as 5:2020cv03127
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flemming
Defendant:
Reginald Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. Baker
as 5:2020cv03098
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flemming
Defendant:
Reginald Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
