Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Morrison County, Minnesota et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 0:2024cv00023
Plaintiff: Morrison County, Minnesota, Richardson Township and Leigh Township
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior, Deb Haaland, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Village of Hobart WI v. United States Department of The Interior et al
as 1:2023cv01511
Plaintiff: Village of Hobart WI
Defendant: United States Department of The Interior, Deb Haaland, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Village of Hobart WI v. United States Department of The Interior et al
as 2:2023cv01511
Plaintiff: Village of Hobart WI
Defendant: United States Department of The Interior, Deb Haaland, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Louisiana v. Haaland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-30666
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Louisiana, American Petroleum Institute, Chevron USA, Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellant: Deb Haaland, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Land & Minerals Management, Laura Daniel-Davis, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Land & Minerals Management, Elizabeth Klein, in her official capacity as Director of Bureau of Energy Management and others
Intervenor: Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Earth and others
Leander Indep Sch Dist v. DOI
as 23-50403
Plaintiff / Appellant: Leander Independent School District
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Deb Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Legend Lake Property Owners Association Inc v. United States Department of The Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00480
Plaintiff: Legend Lake Property Owners Association Inc
Defendant: United States Department of The Interior, Deb Haaland, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Walter Rosales, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 22-16196
Plaintiff / Appellant: WALTER J. ROSALES, LOUIS AYHULE GOMEZ, ESTATE OF KAREN TOGGERY and others
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the Interior, AMY DUTSCHKE, Regional Director, BIA and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 22-15928
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, MARICOPA AUDUBON SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB, Grand Canyon Chapter
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as the Director of FWS and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 22-15809
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, MARICOPA AUDUBON SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB, Grand Canyon Chapter
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as the Director of FWS and others
State of Alaska Department of v. Federal Subsistence Board, et al
as 22-35097
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD, DAVID SCHMID, in his official capacityas the Regional Supervisor for the United States Forest Service, SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?