Cases 21 - 30 of 50
McCollum v. U. S. Attorney General, et al
as 1:2018cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jessie McCollum
Defendant:
U. S. Attorney General, BOP Director, Regional Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. USA et al
as 1:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Keller
Defendant:
usa, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. USA et al
as 2:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Keller
Defendant:
USA, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Ulysses T Ware
Defendant:
Kim Jones, Wanda Jones, Joe White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Domanick v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2017cv00264
Plaintiff:
Martindale Domanick
Defendant:
Attorney General, Regional Director, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medearis v. Bradley et al
as 3:2016cv00248
Plaintiff:
Roni L. Medearis
Defendant:
Barbara Bradley, James Danheim and Steve Massie, Asst. Regional Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landry's, Inc. et al v. National Labor Relations Board et al
as 4:2016cv01548
Plaintiff:
Landry's, Inc. and McCormick & Schmick Restaurant Corp.
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board and John J. Walsh, Regional Director
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Vaughn v. Massie, Asst. Regional Director et al
as 3:2016cv00021
Plaintiff:
William Kelly Vaughn
Defendant:
Steve Massie, Asst. Regional Director, J. Jones, Asst. Warden, Sgt. Augustine Osadolor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baynard v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2015mc00464
Plaintiff:
Cling Mark Baynard
Defendant:
Mr. Stephens, Regional Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cherry v. Officer Dollar et al
as 9:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
William Cherry
Defendant:
Officer Dollar, Sgt. Rains, Officer Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
