Cases 1 - 10 of 15
R.W., et al v. Charter Schools USA, Inc., et al
as 19-10601
Plaintiff / Appellant:
T.W., R.W., JR., a minor and R.W.
Defendant / Appellee:
RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL, INC., THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA and CHARTER SCHOOLS USA, INC.
R.W., et al v. Charter Schools USA, Inc., et al
as 19-10362
Defendant / Appellee:
LABELTH HOWARD, RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL INC., JANA RASKIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
T.W., R.W. and T.P.
Other:
SERVICE
R. W., Sr., et al v. St. Lucie County School Board, et al
as 19-10167
Other:
SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. W., SR., individually, and on behalf of R.W., Jr., a minor, T.W., individually, and on behalf of R.W., Jr., a minor and R.W., JR., a.k.a. R.J.
Defendant / Appellee:
RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL INC., ST. LUCIE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and CHARTER SCHOOLS USA, INC.
R.W. T.W. v. Charter Schools USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv14405
Defendant:
Florida State Board of Education, Jana Raskin, Govenor Rick Scott and others
Plaintiff:
R.W. T.W.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas & Betts Corporation, et al v. New Albertson's Inc.,, et al
as 17-1361
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS & BETTS CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant:
NEW ALBERTSON'S INC.
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
DAMPNEY COMPANY, INC., HYDE PARK MANAGER, INC., as Administrative Trustee for W/S Cardinal Hyde Park-MA Trust, JEWEL FOOD STORES, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant:
RICHARD F. ANDREWS, ALBERT L. ANDREWS, III, ALBERT L. ANDREWS and others
:
Interested Party:
CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC. and SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Thomas & Betts Corporation, et al v. New Albertson's Inc., et al
as 17-1360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS & BETTS CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW ALBERTSON'S INC.
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
DAMPNEY COMPANY, INC., HYDE PARK MANAGER, INC., as Administrative Trustee for W/S Cardinal Hyde Park-MA Trust, JEWEL FOOD STORES, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant:
RICHARD F. ANDREWS, ALBERT L. ANDREWS, III, ALBERT L. ANDREWS and others
:
Interested Party:
CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC. and SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv14443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas & Betts Corporation, et al v. Siemens Industry, Inc., et al
as 16-1204
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS & BETTS CORPORATION and YUKON/HYDE PARK AVENUE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
NEW ALBERTSON'S INC.
Third Party Defendant:
EDWARD H. YUKON, JEANETTE YUKON, as General Partner of Yukon/Hyde Park Avenue Limited Partnership, NEW ALBERTSON'S INC. and others
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
ALLIS-CHALMERS ENERGY, INC. and SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC.
Interested Party:
SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., NEW ALBERTSON'S INC. and CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC.
Thomas & Betts Corporation, et al v. Boston Renaissance Charter, et al
as 16-1134
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS & BETTS CORPORATION and YUKON/HYDE PARK AVENUE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
NEW ALBERTSON'S INC.
Third Party Defendant:
EDWARD H. YUKON, JEANETTE YUKON, as General Partner of Yukon/Hyde Park Avenue Limited Partnership, NEW ALBERTSON'S INC. and others
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
BOSTON RENAISSANCE CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOL and BOSTON RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL, INC.
Interested Party:
SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., NEW ALBERTSON'S INC. and CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC.
Thomas & Betts Corporation, et al v. Alfa Laval Inc., et al
as 16-1133
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS & BETTS CORPORATION and YUKON/HYDE PARK AVENUE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
NEW ALBERTSON'S INC.
Third Party Defendant:
EDWARD H. YUKON, JEANETTE YUKON, as General Partner of Yukon/Hyde Park Avenue Limited Partnership, NEW ALBERTSON'S INC. and others
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
ALFA LAVAL INC.
Interested Party:
SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., NEW ALBERTSON'S INC. and CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
