Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Byrd v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 26-3608
Plaintiff:
MARSHA BYRD
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, REUBART and NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Bacharach v. Reubart, et al.
as 26-2531
Petitioner:
JOSHUA WILLIAM BACHARACH
Respondent:
REUBART, CHARLES DANIELS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Harris v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 26-2265
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, W. A. GITTERE and others
Hixon v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2026cv00964
Plaintiff:
Jenna Hixon
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Brian Williams, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gayles-Zanders v. Reubart et al
as 2:2026cv00613
Petitioner:
Shirron Gayles-Zanders
Respondent:
Reubart and Attorney General State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. Reubart et al
as 2:2026cv00509
Petitioner:
Veneshia Oliver and Vaneshia Oliver
Respondent:
Reubart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Nevada Department of Prisons et al
as 2:2026cv00519
Plaintiff:
Leslie Brown
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Prisons, Ella Cordovez, M. Raines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ehlers v. Reubart et al
as 2:2026cv00476
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Ehlers
Defendant:
Reubart, Officer Leal and James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anguiano v. Reubart et al
as 2:2026cv00363
Petitioner:
Darlene Anguiano
Respondent:
William Reubart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dodd v. Reubart, et al.
as 26-184
Petitioner:
SHAUNNA L. DODD
Respondent:
WILLIAM REUBART, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and JERRY HOWELL, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
