Cases 1 - 10 of 100
S v. Ponder et al
as 2:2026cv03602
Defendant:
Hope for Prisoners, Inc., Jennifer Nash, William Reubart and others
Plaintiff:
R S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cortez v. Stubbs, et al.
as 26-5639
Plaintiff:
MOISES JOSUE CORTEZ
Defendant:
BRANDON STUBBS, MATTHEW ROMAN, J. WEILAND and others
Love v. Reubart
as 2:2026cv02734
Petitioner:
Kyla Love
Respondent:
William Reubart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cole v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2026cv02688
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Cole
Defendant:
Nevada Dept. of Corrections, James Dzurenda, William Reubart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayles-Zanders v. Reubart, et al.
as 26-5485
Petitioner:
SHIRRON GAYLES-ZANDERS
Respondent:
WILLIAM REUBART and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Gayles-Zanders v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas
as 26-4860
Petitioner:
SHIRRON GAYLES-ZANDERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest:
WILLIAM REUBART and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Diana M. Cordon v. James Dzuerda et al
as 2:2026cv02098
Plaintiff:
Diana M. Cordon
Defendant:
William Reubart, Gabriela Najera, Jennifer Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holloway v. Nevada Dept. of Correct. et al
as 2:2026cv01905
Plaintiff:
Lakeisha Holloway
Defendant:
Nevada Dept. of Correct., William Reubart, Joe Lombardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 26-3608
Plaintiff:
MARSHA BYRD
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, REUBART and NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Bacharach v. Reubart, et al.
as 26-2531
Petitioner:
JOSHUA WILLIAM BACHARACH
Respondent:
REUBART, CHARLES DANIELS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
