Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Reyes v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Reyes
Defendant:
Maetin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of SSA Decision SSID - SSI Disability Cases
Howard v. Reyes et al
as 3:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Jason Howard
Defendant:
Reyes, Shanks and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolterstorff v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Robert Munro Wolterstorff III and Robert Munro Wolterstorff, III
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Guadarrama, McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes v. USA
as 3:2023cv00874
Petitioner:
Ricardo Reyes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rashid v. Kurtulus et al
as 3:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Master Rashid
Defendant:
Kalican Kurtulus, Jerome F French, Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nkrumah et al v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, New Haven Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vicente v. Wiggins et al
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Luis Vicente
Defendant:
Wiggins, Dougherty, Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes et al v. McSherry et al
as 3:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
RUTH REYES
Defendant:
VIKIANA PERALTA, TERRENCE LEO MCSHERRY and ROCKY MOUNTAIN FIBER PLUS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Nkrumah et al v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, Justin Elicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
