Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Roberts v. Gettle et al
as 1:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Christopher Roberts
Defendant:
Jennifer W. Gettle, Richard A. Lewis and Edward M. Marsico, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Marsico, Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harris
Defendant:
Edward M. Marsico, Jr., Francis T. Chardo, Richard A. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Gale et al
as 1:2020cv01805
Defendant:
Martha Gale, President Judge Richard A. Lewis, Adrian and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Chardo et al
as 1:2018cv00477
Plaintiff:
Aiyda Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
Francis T. Chardo, Richard A. Lewis and Bradley A. Winnick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEWIS et al v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
as 2:2017cv01104
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. LEWIS and TRINA M. LEWIS
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
LEWIS et al v. LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, F.S.B. et al
as 2:2016cv02607
Defendant:
LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, F.S.B, LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, F.S.B., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LEWIS, RICHARD A. LEWIS and TRINA M. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lovejoy v. Lewis et al
as 3:2015cv02495
Plaintiff:
Alex Leroy Lovejoy
Defendant:
Richard A. Lewis, Michael L. Rozman, Edward M. Marsico, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UPSHUR v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DAUPHIN COUNTY et al
as 2:2012cv03208
Plaintiff:
ALBERT UPSHUR
Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DAUPHIN COUNTY, TOM CORBETT, JOSEPH H. KLEINFELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. FISHER
as 2:2011cv05035
Petitioner:
RICHARD L. LEWIS
Respondent:
JON FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEWIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43193
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. LEWIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
