Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Vincent Bruce v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-15982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT C. BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, RICHARD A. RIMMER, M. RUFF and others
Demian O'Keeffe v. Richard Rimmer, et al
as 11-17558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMIAN TREVOR O'KEEFFE
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD A. RIMMER, CAROL A DALY, ROBERT SINTON and others
Byron Johnson v. David Runnels, et al
as 11-16697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID L. RUNNELS, RODERICK HICKMAN, Youth and Adult Correctional Secretary, RICHARD A. RIMMER, Former Director of CDC and others
Robert Bond v. Richard Rimmer, et al
as 11-16061
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LOREN BOND
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD A. RIMMER and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Hulen Harrell v. P. Palmer, et al
as 11-15500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HULEN T. HARRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
P. D. PALMER, CDC Captain, POPOVICH, Lieutenant, B C ADAMS, Facility 1 Captain and others
Bond v. Rimmer, et al
as 2:1999cv02150
Petitioner:
Robert Loren Bond
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of California and Richard A Rimmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harry Williby v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 08-17449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY J. WILLIBY
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, TOM L. CAREY, EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr. and others
Edward Jones v. Richard Rimmer, et al
as 08-56798
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD C. JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD A. RIMMER, Acting Dirctor of the CA Dept. of Corrections and JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director of California Department of Corrections
Richard A. Mongeon v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2007cv06941
Plaintiff:
Richard A Mongeon
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jerry Reid, Richard A Rimmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
