Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Polk v. Fisher et al
as 3:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
James M. Polk
Defendant:
Richard Fisher, Peter O'Shea, Alphonso Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates v. Fisher et al
as 3:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
John Yates
Defendant:
Richard Fisher, Maher Kasabji, Peter O'Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Fisher
as 3:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
William Hill
Defendant:
Richard Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Cook et al
as 3:2020cv00864
Plaintiff:
Kenya Brown
Defendant:
Yvonne, Debra Cruz, Lithenstine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. USA
as 2:2017cv02218
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fisher v. USA
as 3:2016cv00339
Petitioner:
Brandon Richard Fisher
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FISHER v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2014cv05478
Petitioner:
RICHARD FISHER
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Samuels v. Davis et al
as 1:2014cv02588
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Samuels
Defendant:
John L. Davis, Patricia Baldwin, Kerri Baroni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bawden v. Richins et al
as 2:2012cv01178
Plaintiff:
Heidi Bawden
Defendant:
Teresa Richins, Jason McClellan, Richard Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karl Guillen v. Quincy Owens, et al
as 12-16298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL LOUIS GUILLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
QUINCY OWENS, Deputy Warden at ASPC/Lewis RSAT, in his individual and official capacities, CHARLES L. RYAN, named as Chuck Ryan, ADC Director at ADC Central Office, in his individual and official capacities, B. ROBERTS, CO IV at ASPC/Lewis RAST, in his individual and official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
