Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Richard Owens v. Pfeiffer
as 2:2018cv06866
Defendant:
Pfeiffer
Plaintiff:
Richard Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Owens v. Soto et al
as 2:2018cv01108
Defendant:
A. Christinsen, R Franklin, -, S Marolla and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Owens
Richard Owens v. R. Franklin et al
as 2:2017cv08910
Defendant:
Correctional Officer A. Christinsen, Correctional Officer A. Christinsen, Sergeant R. Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Owens
Richard Owens, Jr. v. A. Matthew
as 17-55753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD OWENS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
A. MATTHEWS, in their individual and official capacity
Charles Ortego, et al v. Lummi Island Scenic Estates Co, et al
as 17-35372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES E. ORTEGO, JOHN S. APOLIS, VICTOR D. ARMFIELD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LUMMI ISLAND SCENIC ESTATES COMMUNITY CLUB, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation, MARK R. SEXTON, individual, DOUGLAS CASH, individual and others
Charles Ortego, et al v. Lummi Island Scenic Estates Co, et al
as 17-35337
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES E. ORTEGO, JOHN S. APOLIS, VICTOR D. ARMFIELD and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LUMMI ISLAND SCENIC ESTATES COMMUNITY CLUB, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation, MARK R. SEXTON, individual, DOUGLAS CASH, individual and others
Owens v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00321
Plaintiff:
Richard Owens
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Ortego, et al v. Lummi Island Scenic Estates Co, et al
as 17-35030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES E. ORTEGO, JOHN S. APOLIS, VICTOR D. ARMFIELD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LUMMI ISLAND SCENIC ESTATES COMMUNITY CLUB, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation, MARK R. SEXTON, individual, MARK R. SEXTON, individual and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
