Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Ambrose Gill v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 4:2010cv05936
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Gill
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger , Ten Unknown Named Defendants, Greg Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ambrose Gill v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2010cv05936
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Gill
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger , Ten Unknown Named Defendants, Greg Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Fishback et al
as 5:2010cv05084
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Johnson
Defendant:
David Fishback, M Carrizosa, Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheeler et al v. Hilo Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01826
Plaintiff:
Darrell William Wheeler and Pauline Ellis
Defendant:
Hilo Medical Center, Inc., Ronald Schurra, Gary Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roe et al v. Doe et al
as 3:2009cv00682
Plaintiff:
Richard Roe, Richard Roe, II and Don A. Nelson
Defendant:
John Doe, Mark Cuban, Mark Cuban and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Griffiths v. Ormsby et al
as 3:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
Michael Griffiths
Defendant:
M. Ormsby, Linteo, Riley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cicala et al v. City of San Jose et al
as 5:2008cv04032
Plaintiff:
Paul Cicala, Enrico Sagullo and Erick Sanchez
Defendant:
City of San Jose, Robert Davis, Ordaz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nava v. Seadler et al
as 5:2008cv03066
Plaintiff:
Nancy Nava
Defendant:
Mike Seadler, Clyde Cheng, Alex Torke and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Skobel v. Giancarlo et al
as 5:2008cv01442
Plaintiff:
Sergey Skobel
Defendant:
Ella Giancarlo, Gary Cortez, John Doe and Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Montiel v. Williams et al
as 5:2007cv05490
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Montiel
Defendant:
M. Williams, C. Sheppard, Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
