Cases 41 - 50 of 52
JONES v. SINGLETON et al
as 2:2015cv01014
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JONES
Defendant:
RAYMOND SINGLETON, MICHAEL EDINGER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOLLOIVER et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS TOLLOIVER and JOHN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOSEPH MCCLOSKEY, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTIAGO et al v. HULMES et al
as 2:2014cv07109
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS SANTIAGO , MARGARITA SANTIAGO and EXOR SANTIAGO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY, PATRICK BANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWTON v. MCCLOSKY et al
as 2:2014cv06799
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH NEWTON and LUZ GARCIA
Defendant:
JOSEPH MCCLOSKY, MICHAEL SPICER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PURDIE et al v. SPICER et al
as 2:2014cv06639
Plaintiff:
RONALD PURDIE , RAGIB WITHERSPOON and JAMES FANNINGS
Defendant:
MICHAEL SPICER, PERRY BETTS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADKINS et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05852
Plaintiff:
JO-MAR ADKINS , CAROLYN ANTHONY , ROSIA BAKER-SPANN and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2011cv64230
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ROSS
Defendant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOYD et al v. TIMCHO et al
as 2:2007cv02855
Plaintiff:
AARON BOYD, SHONI BOYD, SHERRON BOYD and others
Defendant:
EDWARD TIMCHO, SHE-HEAN CARTER, JOHN KHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DICKERSON v. ROSS
as 2:2007cv02304
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. DICKERSON
Defendant:
RICHARD ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
