Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Carter v. Inhofe et al
as 4:2022cv00474
Defendant:
John Stitt, James M Inhofe, James Lankford and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jeremiah Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Klundt et al v. Kent et al
as 1:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Marie A. Kent, Paul H. Stevens, Thornton Municipal and others
Plaintiff:
Kristina Marie Klundt, Katie Leann Liscomb and Kristina Marie Klundt Lofquist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofquist v. Stevens
as 1:2019cv03061
Plaintiff:
Kristina M. Klundt Lofquist and Kristina Marie Klundt Lofquist
Defendant:
Paul H. Stevens, George Rose, Echo D. Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuels v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-5002
Defendant / Appellee:
ALISSA PREBLE HUTTER, DAVID BEEN, MARK KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDE LEE SAMUELS
Samuels v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2018cv00267
Plaintiff:
Brande L Samuels
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Bar Association City of Tulsa, Tulsa County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guthrie v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00199
Petitioner:
Richard Steven Guthrie
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Murray v. State Of Oklahoma, et al
as 08-6067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. MURRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, BRAD HENRY, Governor, ANDREA COLLUM, staff member and others
Winkler et al v. Thornton, Colorado, City of et al
as 1:2007cv00646
Plaintiff:
Larry F. Winkler, Larry F. Winkler, Larry F. Winkler and others
Defendant:
Thornton, Colorado, City of, Thornton, Colorado, City of, Thornton, Colorado, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
