Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tillett v. Appalachian Power Company et al
as 7:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Tillett
Defendant:
Appalachian Power Company, Thayer Power & Communication Line Construction Co., LLC and IBEW Local 317
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Booker v. Washington and Lee University et al
as 6:2012cv00049
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Booker
Defendant:
Warrenetta Kay Bostick, Brandon R. Dotson, Sidney Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thomas v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
as 3:2008cv00825
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Andrews v. Newman, et al
as 3:2007cv00060
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Andrews and Erika D. Andrews
Defendant:
Richard Thomas Newman, CLI Transport, LP and Sheetz, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Chlebnikow v. Newman et al
as 3:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
Cora Chlebnikow
Defendant:
Richard Thomas Newman, CLI Transport, LP and Sheetz, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Kirby et al v. Newman
as 3:2007cv00049
Plaintiff:
Herman E. Kirby and Nancy H. Kirby
Defendant:
Richard Thomas Newman, CLI Transport, LP and Sheetz, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Angelo v. Thomas
as 1:2007cv00261
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Angelo
Defendant:
Richard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Nicholson et al v. Newman et al
as 3:2007cv00006
Plaintiff:
William L Nicholson and Brenda S. Nicholson
Defendant:
Richard Thomas Newman, Richard Thomas Newman, CLI Transport, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
