Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Richard Kendrick v. L. Edmonds
as 23-7101
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD WADE KENDRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
L. EDMONDS, Warden
Richard Kendrick v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7108
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD WADE KENDRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Richard Kendrick v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7099
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD WADE KENDRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
XPO Logistics v. Leeway Global Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00703
Plaintiff:
XPO Logistics
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Aaron Peterson
Defendant:
Leeway Global Logistics LLC, Leeway Global Logistics Inc, Adam Sudweeks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Richard Kendrick v. L. Edmonds
as 22-7126
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD WADE KENDRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
L. EDMONDS, Warden
Kendrick v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2022cv00454
Petitioner:
Richard Wade Kendrick
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kendrick v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2022cv00431
Petitioner:
Richard Wade Kendrick
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DEHLINGER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13302
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WADE DEHLINGER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kendrick v. Edmonds
as 7:2021cv00505
Petitioner:
Richard Wade Kendrick
Respondent:
L. Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kendrick v. Albemarle County et al
as 7:2021cv00141
Defendant:
Amanda Galloway, Jeff Richardson, Robert Thaccee and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Wade Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
