Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Anglin v. Lewis et al
as 3:2012cv00488
Plaintiff:
Troy Anglin
Defendant:
Rick Lewis, Captain Grandon and Nurse Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUNNINGHAM v. MAUGHMER et al
as 2:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
RICK MAUGHMER and LISA SWAIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alspach v. Hunter et al
as 1:2010cv00421
Plaintiff:
Larry Alspach
Defendant:
Tim Hunter, Rick Ploss, Sgt Brian Raber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2010cv00094
Defendant:
MAJOR SAM BEARD, CAPTAIN R. DOGGEN DORF, DIRECTOR RICK ELLIOTT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2010cv00089
Defendant:
MAJOR SAM BEARD, CAPTAIN R. DOGGEN DORF, DIRECTOR RICK ELLIOTT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDMOND IV v. SHERIFF ERIC WILLIAMS et al
as 3:2010cv00083
Defendant:
CONFINEMENT OFFICER ELSFELDER, CONFINEMENT OFFICER J. BUGG, FEMALE CONFINEMENT OFFICER SCMITT and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. REDMOND IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RHODES v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2010cv00024
Defendant:
MAJOR SAM BEARD, NURSE PRACTITIONER DENISE BROOKS, DIRECTOR RICK ELLIOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coburn v. Martin
as 3:2009cv00534
Plaintiff:
Rick Coburn
Defendant:
Terry Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Henderson et al
as 3:2009cv00303
Plaintiff:
Dennis Barker
Defendant:
Deanna Henderson, Rick Schwartz, Sally Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARKER v. HENDERSON et al
as 1:2009cv00818
Plaintiff:
DENNIS BARKER
Defendant:
DEANNA HENDERSON, RICK SCHWARTZ, SALLY CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
