Cases 1 - 10 of 370
Aitken v. Dixon et al
as 3:2025cv00009
Defendant:
Sergeant Robinson, Warden Chris Lane, Ricky Dixon and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Aitken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOBIN v. MOODY et al
as 3:2024cv00550
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, MATT GAETZ, KIMBERLY TORRES and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW A TOBIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redfurn v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv01364
Defendant:
Jordan Hewitt and Ricky Dixon
Plaintiff:
Dumar M. Redfurn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Dixon et al
as 2:2024cv14406
Defendant:
Secretary Ricky Dixon, Mary Alice "Kym" Surowiec, Steven Weisberg and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Alan Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00520
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY MOODY
Petitioner:
MARCUS DEWAYNE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toledo v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Toledo
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Lisa Delk, A. Johns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WITCHER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00189
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Petitioner:
ANDRELO WITCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson et al v. Dixon et al
as 1:2024cv24253
Defendant:
Warden Francisco Acosta, Secretary Ricky Dixon and Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Dwayne K Wilson, Wheeler Gary and Tyrone B Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Symonette v. Governor Of Florida et al
as 3:2024cv01313
Defendant:
Judge Bertila Soto, Judge Lawson, Daniel Palardy and others
Plaintiff:
Vedrick LaMonte Symonette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00201
Petitioner:
ERIC T FRAZIER
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
