Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Riley v. PennyMac Loan Service, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Adrianyon Riley
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Service, LLC and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Alliance Funding Group v. Landworx, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Alliance Funding Group
Defendant:
Landworx, LLC and Matthew Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Riley v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, et al
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Maurice Riley
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc., Fictitious Defendants "A", "B," and "C," and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United States of America v. Riley
as 3:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alexandria Riley
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Griffin v. Baysore
as 3:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Riley Griffin
Defendant:
Warden Baysore
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Riley v. Petal MS City Government et al
as 2:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jay Riley
Defendant:
Petal MS City Government and Petal Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Riley v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Riley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Gillman of Fort Bend, Inc. v. Riley
as 4:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Gillman of Fort Bend, Inc.
Defendant:
Otis Riley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
