Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Riley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Eric Riley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Myers v. Mushtaq et al
as 4:2022cv00481
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers
Defendant:
Ms. Mushtaq, Ms. Gerson, Ms. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Hench et al
as 1:2021cv01845
Plaintiff:
Larry Riley, Jr.
Defendant:
RN Andrew Hench, Holy Spirit Hospital of the Sisters of Christian Charity, Inc. Individually trading & doing business as Geisinger Holy Spirit Hospital and Penn State Health Holy Spirit Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Riley v. Miller et al
as 1:2021cv01647
Plaintiff:
Daniel Riley
Defendant:
George Miller, James J. Cirellli, Joseph Grillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00914
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Riley v. Barr et al
as 3:2021cv00085
Defendant:
Warden Scott Finley, Unknown Defendant(s) and William Barr
Plaintiff:
Ernest Dwayne Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Respondent:
Pharmatech Laboratory, C.O.1 Bullick, Fidel Clark(c)TM and others
Petitioner:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riley v. Diaz et al
as 1:2020cv01100
Defendant:
Mahanoy Prison, Practioner Gusitutt, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Warren J. Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Defendant:
CO 1 L.M. McGinnis, Gregory Redden, CO 1 Kyler and others
Plaintiff:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
