Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
King v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv10327
Defendant: Carrier Corporation, Fort Kent Holdings, Inc., IMO Industries, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: HBW Industries, Inc., Riley Power Inc., The Marley-Wylain Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff: John S. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Knox et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11695
Plaintiff: Thomas Knox, Rosemarie Knox and Bayer Cropscience Inc., Successor in interest to Amchem Products, Inc.
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alliance Laundry Systems LLC Individually and as successor-in-interest to American Laundry Machinery Co., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Columbia Boiler Company, Crane Co., Crosby Valve, LLC and others
Cross Claimant: General Electric Company
Interested Party: Defendants Liaison Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Michael Twombly v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10236
Defendant: Aurora Pump, Ford Motor Company, VAPOR POWER INTERNATIONAL and others
Cross Defendant: Crosby Valve, LLC, Crane Co., York International Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: General Electric Company, COPES VULCAN, INC., The Budd Company and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL TWOMBLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILBUR TWOMBLY and Michael Twombly
3Rd Party Defendant: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Not Classified By Court: Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Cupp v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10168
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation, BW/IP, Inc., Warren Pumps LLC and others
Cross Claimant: Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Defendant: Ericsson, Inc., Industrial Holdings Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Gail Cupp, James Cupp, Jason Cupp and others
Not Classified By Court: Robert B. Collings, Edward F. Harrington and Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Hardy v. Crane Co. et al
as 1:2017cv10826
Defendant: Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: FMC Corporation and Bayer Cropscience, Inc.
Cross Defendant: Riley Power Inc., A. W. Chesterton Co., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Charles Hardy
Not Classified By Court: Judge Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Shelby et al v. A.W. Chesterton et al
as 1:2009cv10594
Plaintiff: Lynn Montero
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc., Asco Valves, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Murphy et al v. Rapid American Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv10475
Plaintiff: Tricia Jean Murphy and Sandra L Wood
Defendant: Rapid American Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Durabla Manufacturing Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Van Riper et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2009cv10384
Plaintiff: Ronald J Van Riper and Sheila Van Riper
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc., Bayer Cropscience, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Gobeil et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2009cv10382
Plaintiff: Roland E Gobeil and Jeanne Gobeil
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc., American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Polson v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv10002
Plaintiff: Paul Polson
Defendant: Bayer Cropscience, Inc., Owens Illinois, Inc, Owens Illinois Glass Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?